Inquest findings highlight major failings at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

Thursday 1 May 2025

Fatima Jichi of Garden Court Chambers was instructed by solicitors Keiu Kikas and Mollie Eglesfield, with support from paralegal Felix Parsons of GT Stewart, to represent the family.

The below content has been reproduced from a GT Stewart press release.

Share This Page

Email This Page

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The legal team represented the family of a vulnerable man who tragically died while detained under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act at a hospital run by South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM). The man had presented to Accident & Emergency following a significant self-inflicted injury, triggered by hearing distressing voices in his head. Despite being detained under section for two weeks, he remained distressed, and reported to staff on the day of his death that the voices were just as intense as when he was first admitted.

However, the hospital failed to carry out appropriate risk assessments or put in place an adequate care plan. There was not a single person on the ward that he knew well or who had built a therapeutic relationship with him. As a result, no single staff member developed meaningful insight into his risk profile. Tragically, he took his own life in his hospital room after staff did not carry out an hourly observation on time.

Critical findings

The legal team worked with the family to prepare for the inquest, reviewing evidence and identifying key failings in the care provided. The team raised these concerns with the Coroner to ensure they were fully explored during the final inquest hearing.

Conclusion

At the inquest, the jury returned a highly critical narrative conclusion. They identified multiple failings by SLaM, including:

  • the failure to document that the deceased had reported experiencing symptoms with the same intensity as when he was first admitted,
  • inadequate risk assessments and observations on the day of his death,
  • and a lack of meaningful engagement with his primary nurse.

They concluded that these failings amounted to a lack of proper monitoring on the ward, which contributed to his death.

Related Areas of Law

We are top ranked by independent legal directories and consistently win awards.

+ View more awards