Seal v UK (App no: 50330/07): European Court of Human Rights (7 December 2010): The claimant had brought a claim against the police as a result of the police exercising powers under section 136 Mental Health Act 1983 as amended (“the MHA 1983”) which inter alia included claims for assault and trespass to the person. […]
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Hounslow (Respondents) v Powell (Appellant); Leeds City Council (Respondent) v Hall (Appellant); Birmingham City Council (Respondent) v Frisby (Appellant)[2011] UKSC 8 (Lord Phillips (President), Lord Hope (Deputy President), Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Collins): These combined appeals concern the making of orders for […]
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Taous Lassal, Child Poverty Action Group (intervening) C-162/09, CJEU (Third Chamber) (K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), G. Arestis, J. Malenovský and T. von Danwitz): The European Court of Justice held that articles 16(1) and 16(4) of Directive 2004/38/EC must be interpreted […]
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Hounslow (Respondents) v Powell (Appellant); Leeds City Council (Respondent) v Hall (Appellant); Birmingham City Council (Respondent) v Frisby (Appellant)[2011] UKSC 8 (Lord Phillips (President), Lord Hope (Deputy President), Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Collins): These combined appeals concern the making of orders for […]
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Taous Lassal, Child Poverty Action Group (intervening) C-162/09, CJEU (Third Chamber) (K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), G. Arestis, J. Malenovský and T. von Danwitz): The European Court of Justice held that articles 16(1) and 16(4) of Directive 2004/38/EC must be interpreted […]
R (H) v Birmingham CC [2010] EWHC 2754 Admin (HHJ Purle QC): the council had acted lawfully in consulting on bringing its respite care scheme within its RAS (resource allocation scheme) and assessing the needs of both carers and service users. It had been reasonable to focus on procedures and not outcomes. Complaints that individuals […]
Case Law R (RO) v East Riding of Yorkshire [2011] EWCA Civ 196 (Rix, Smith and Richards LLJ): Allowing the appeal brought by an extremely vulnerable 15-year-old boy with severe autism co-morbid with severe ADHD, the Court of Appeal's judgment establishes the primacy of the LAC regime under Children Act 1989 over the Education Act […]
P (aka MIG) and Q (aka MEG) (by their litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Surrey C C and others[2011] EWCA Civ 190 (Mummery, Smith and Wilson LJJ): in assessing whether care arrangements for severely disabled teenagers /young adults who lacked capacity might engage Article 5 and amount to a DOL, three elements had to […]
