Susan is a dual-qualified American lawyer whose public law practice focuses on the overlapping areas of mental capacity and mental health. She is particularly skilled in the cross-examination of expert witnesses.
Susan is ranked in the 2025 edition of the Legal 500 directory as a ‘Leading Junior’ in the field of Court of Protection and Community Care
“ Susan Wright has a well-developed Court of Protection practice that sees her regularly acting in highly sensitive mental health capacity matters.” Chambers and Partners 2025
Susan is registered with the Bar Council to accept Direct Access work.
Community Care Law
Court of Protection
Overview
Susan is regularly instructed by the Official Solicitor, ALRs, family members, Local Authorities, and NHS Trusts in s.21A challenges and s.16 matters,. She specialises in cases with complex medical evidence and has a particular interest in cases which fall under the inherent jurisdiction. In addition to welfare work, Susan appears in serious medical treatment cases involving children and adults.
Susan appeared as junior counsel in the first case to come before the Court of Appeal on the meaning of s 44 Mental Capacity Act 2005 (ill-treatment or neglect of a person lacking mental capacity) Kurtz v R [2018] EWCA Crim 274.
Her current COP caseload includes:
- Representing NHS Trust in serious medical treatment case involving withdrawal of treatment for life-threatening burns
Acting for a child P, by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor in respect of urgent treatment following food refusal alongside complex welfare proceedings
Representing local authority in welfare proceedings involving P with longstanding history of hoarding behaviour whose forced removal was required to ensure his safety
Acting for P, by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor in several cases where application has been made for closed material
- Representing P who is recovering from stroke with complex presentation, communication barriers, and fluctuating capacity. Matters complicated by the disputed legal basis for the initial and ongoing use of a percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy (PEG) feeding tube through which food, water and medication have at times been administered
- Several cases involving representation in S. 21A proceedings where the court is being asked to authorised a move to a foreign care home
- Several cases involving representation in proceedings where P was detained under the Mental Health Act and became the subject of urgent hearings ahead of 18th birthday in anticipation of discharge
- Several cases involving representation in proceedings which follow protracted placement in a hospital setting where the parties agree it is detrimental for P to continue to reside
- Representing parent with Deputy status in circumstances where the Local Authority fail to recognise the status but decline to invite the Court to remove
- Representing P in care home whose return home was being considered by the court but whose LPA was proceeding with the sale of P’s property, requiring an emergency injunction to stop the sale
Contact Susan
MENTAL HEALTH TRIBUNAL
Overview
Experienced in all aspects of mental health law, Susan is particularly skilled at cross-examining experts.
She has established working relationships with a range of medical experts and contributed to the Sentencing Council’s “Sentencing offenders with mental disorders, developmental disorders, or neurological impairments” as well as the CPS guidance “Suspects and Defendants with Mental Health Conditions or Disorders.”
Notable Cases
SH v R, Court of Appeal (2022): Appellant’s Section 37 Hospital Order quashed and absolute discharge substituted.
R v EK, Oxford Crown Court (2019): Led by Clare Wade QC, represented the first defendant charged with violating 44(1)(b) of Mental Capacity Act, following the death of her mother. There were complex issues of capacity which were the subject of repeated submissions during trial. The Court of Appeal ultimately reversed the conviction, accepting those submissions. The case received national news coverage including the BBC, Metro and Gazette. R v Emma Jane Kurtz [2019] 1 Cr.App.R 19z
Contact Susan
Education Law
Overview
Susan accepts instructions in education cases, particularly challenging decisions to permanently exclude students and opposing transfers to Pupil Referral Units. She is a member of the School Inclusion Project and as a direct access barrister she can be instructed directly, without the need for a solicitor. She often acts on a pro bono basis.